Using more science to eliminate “compostable” hype

By Clare Goldsberry
Published: January 13th, 2012

In a move that promises to elevate the level of scientific testing to the compostable or debate, the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) has selected NSF International, a global independent public health organization, to administer the BPI's Certified Compostable program.  NSF International is a global third-party, independent certification organization that will accept and review certification requests to ensure that all BPI-certified products continue to meet ASTM 6400 or ASTM D6868 standards for compostability, according a release from BPI.

Companies submit products and testing data to substantiate the biodegradation, disintegration and absence of eco-toxicity of their products including compostable bags, foodservice items, packaging materials, and other consumer products. NSF will then verify manufacturers' claims of compostability in large-scale composting facilities, said information from BPI. There has been a five-fold increase in compostable plastic product certifications since 2006, noted BPI, and NSF will help alleviate the bottle-neck.certified compostable

NSF International will administer the BPI program through its NSF Sustainability division, which provides testing and verification of environmental claims for consumer products, green chemicals, sustainable furnishing and building materials such as carpet, flooring and fabrics. NSF also provides process verification services, which include greenhouse gas verification, environmental foot-printing, and environmental management systems, said a release from NSF.

Overwhelming volume of certification requests

Cheryl Navarro, project manager for NSF, who will be managing the BPI program, told PlasticsToday that interest and inquiries for BPI's certification has grown so much that BPI couldn't handle the volume. "They are interested in strengthening their program," she said. "Some of the labs they currently use are ISO 17025 certified, however for those that are not currently ISO 17025 certified, we're working with them to help them get that certification. However, it will remain the BPI's certification."  

Partnering with NSF means that the BPI certification program will comply with the requirements of ISO Guide 65, the internationally recognized standard for third-party certifications bodies. After certification, manufacturers, authorized distributors and resellers may then license the BPI's "Compostable Logo" for marketing claims, said BPI.

The new service agreement is designed to bolster the credibility and capability of the 10-year-old BPI "Compostable Logo" program, which has experienced unprecedented growth in recent years, according to BPI's information. "By partnering with NSF, the BPI certification program will also comply with the requirements of ISO Guide 65, the internationally recognized standard for third-party certification bodies," said BPI's release.

Certifying the certifiers

David S. Brooks, BPI Certification Program Administrator, said in an interview with PlasticsToday that BPI operates as "double-high bar" to ensure that testing by materials and products manufacturers is done correctly and by certified testing labs. "The labs that BPI has certified have been physically visited and certified by us or one of our academic members," Brooks said.  

This elevated level of certification by NSF to ensure test results will add a layer of protection against fraud. "There's so much pseudo-science out there, such as additives that are supposed to magically transform any plastic into a biodegradable material and ASTM standards used incorrectly that unless you have an independent organization verifying those tests, you can have unscrupulous people putting out products that aren't what they claim," Brooks said. "If there's a question about the testing or if the tests are incomplete or their material doesn't disintegrate in a timely fashion, we work with them to make sure the tests are accurate before we give them the 'Compostable Logo.'  BPI was formed to bring science and rationality into these discussions and we do enforce our certification process."

See

See www.plasticwastesolutions.com as to why this is very misleading.

Compostable plastics are not worth too much to a consumer for a number of reasons.
1) There are very few compost facilities around to use.
2) Over 90% of our plastic goes to landfills at the moment
3) Compostable plastics do not biodegrade in a landfill
4) Compostable plastics require highish temps over 60 deg C, oxygen and humidify to work. Without those they will NOT biodegrade
5)Consumers can't tell what is compostable and what is not. It has a #7 on it which is ‘Other plastics’, so it is not differentiated & goes out with all other trash
6) Consumers are not going to drive across town to drop off a few compostable forks and knives even if they did have a compost facility within driving distance. They are going to put them in the trash.
7) Those composting facilities that are around are now turning away compostable plastics like PLA as they do not break down and clog up their machines instead. Same with compostable plastic bags.
So where is the advantage of compostable plastics?
What BPI is doing is telling everyone what a great thing compostable plastics are and adding this independent verification to the compostable claim. It is nice to have a verifiable claim, but if no one is using the compostable procedure the verification has no meaning. In reality compostable plastics are not doing anything to alleviate plastic waste. This is a lot of green washing.
Brook's comment about magical additives that transform a plastic to be biodegradable is biased as it is not based on scientific data. There are biodegradable additives that are letting plastics 30-50% biodegrade in a landfill in 150 days. No compostable product can do that. A real hard look at the compostable plastics needs to be taken by the FTC as they are not bringing the promise of biodegrading plastics away. Instead they are duping consumers into preferentially buying these products well knowing the products will not biodegrade away. It is another selling gimmick that the compostable plastic industry is perpetrating, but the failure of their promotions has serious environmental concerns.

These dates are based on what

These dates are based on what happens going through an industrial composting facility, such as Cedar Grove in Washington State.

Having said that, claiming compostability is problematic since most of this product ends up in a landfill where nothing can compost.

I like Steve Mojo and I think

I like Steve Mojo and I think the idea for a trade association is a fine one with noble purposes. To maintain it's integrity, it must be free of participating in standards making or verifying. Being inherently impervious to mitigation is the epitome of integrity and shall best be achieved through the creation of standards and verification of compliance by a third party independent to the trade association.
Scott McKye
KLEERTECH

I fully agree with Anonymous.

I fully agree with Anonymous. Why 180 days? If it takes 181 days so what? Its better than hundreds of years! Needless to say hidden agenda and political ( negative ones ) motives are evident.The tests that BPI should confirm is anaerobic. Not as litter. Rubbish are always buried at landfills.

Fairplay.

"pseud-science"? The

"pseud-science"? The pseudo-science and fraud begins with the BPI itself. Compostable plastic should be labeled Compost-neutral. The BPI plastics contribute nothing to the compost and are energy-negative -- withdrawing energy from the compost. So the fraud begins with them. And who invented the 180 days? And why? Surely plastic owes it great success to flexibility in purpose. Why should the BPI tell manufacturers what is the proper time for degradation based on single standard unsuitable for many products lifetime?

The BPI is a PAC

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Media Kit  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact  |  Feedback  |  Subscribe | | |

© 2011 UBM Canon | please visit these other sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows